Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Uss Gerald R Ford results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 546 hits . Analysis detected 3,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,166 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,843 keywords). This Uss Gerald R Ford is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Uss Gerald R Ford
Keyword details
Total words: 6,166
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst