Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Usha Vance Pregnancy Wardrobe Fires Nyt Cost Price Brand Maternity Fashion results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 529 hits. Analysis detected 2,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (17,586 of 37,536 keywords). This Usha Vance Pregnancy Wardrobe Fires Nyt Cost Price Brand Maternity Fashion is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Usha Vance Pregnancy Wardrobe Fires Nyt Cost Price Brand Maternity Fashion
Keyword details
Total words: 3,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos