Keyword summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 1,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Senate Debate results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 2,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,187 of 37,536 keywords). This US Senate Debate is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. US Senate Debate
Keyword details
Total words: 3,210
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst