Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Press And Publishing results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 858 hits . Analysis detected 6,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,840 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,370 of 37,536 keywords). This Us Press And Publishing is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. Us Press And Publishing
Keyword details
Total words: 6,840
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst