Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Men's National Team results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,766 hits . Analysis detected 8,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,428 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,720 of 37,536 keywords). This Us Men's National Team is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. Us Men's National Team
Keyword details
Total words: 11,428
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst