Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These US Marshals Service results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This US Marshals Service is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
US Marshals Service
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%US Marshals Service (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 882
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles882 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos