Keyword summary
39% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Iran Deal results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,849 hits . Analysis detected 8,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,420 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,509 of 37,536 keywords). This Us Iran Deal is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Us Iran Deal
Keyword details
Total words: 14,420
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst