Keyword summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Forces results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 772 hits . Analysis detected 4,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,320 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,009 of 36,611 keywords). This US Forces is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. US Forces
Keyword details
Total words: 4,320
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.0% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst