Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Food And Drug Administration results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 833 hits. Analysis detected 4,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (20,063 of 37,536 keywords). This Us Food And Drug Administration is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Us Food And Drug Administration
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos