Keyword summary
85%1 analyzed article/video1,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Federal Courts results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,132 hits. Analysis detected 6,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,864 of 37,530 keywords). This US Federal Courts is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
US Federal Courts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%US Federal Courts (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,505
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.4%19.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos