Keyword summary
27% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us-China Relations results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,691 hits . Analysis detected 15,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,075 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (31,058 of 35,203 keywords). This Us-China Relations is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Us-China Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 21,075
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles21.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst