Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Planning And Development results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,932 hits. Analysis detected 10,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,716 of 37,536 keywords). This Urban Planning And Development is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Urban Planning And Development
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.7%21.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos