Keyword summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Milwaukee results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,178 hits. Analysis detected 5,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,024 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (25,993 of 55,706 keywords). This Urban Milwaukee is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Urban Milwaukee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠54%Urban Milwaukee (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,024
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos