Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Institute results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anchoring Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 1,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,089 of 37,536 keywords). This Urban Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. Urban Institute
Keyword details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.1% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 25.7% 25.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 29.7% 29.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst