Keyword summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Forestry results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 451 hits . Analysis detected 3,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,058 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,434 of 37,536 keywords). This Urban Forestry is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Urban Forestry
Keyword details
Total words: 4,058
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst