Keyword summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Tennessee results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,243 hits . Analysis detected 8,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,866 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,382 of 35,831 keywords). This University Of Tennessee is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. University Of Tennessee
Keyword details
Total words: 9,866
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst