Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Southern California results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 1,040 hits. Analysis detected 6,677 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,340 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,195 of 36,004 keywords). This University Of Southern California is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
University Of Southern California
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
50%University Of Southern California (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,340
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos