Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Missouri System results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 6,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,992 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,956 of 37,536 keywords). This University Of Missouri System is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. University Of Missouri System
Keyword details
Total words: 6,992
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst