Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These University Of Michigan Survey results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and In-Group Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 409 hits. Analysis detected 3,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This University Of Michigan Survey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
University Of Michigan Survey
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos