Keyword summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Chicago Study results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 3,605 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (27,835 of 37,536 keywords). This University Of Chicago Study is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
University Of Chicago Study
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos