Keyword summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Presidential Election results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 936 hits . Analysis detected 7,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,634 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,132 of 34,701 keywords). This United States Presidential Election is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. United States Presidential Election
Keyword details
Total words: 4,634
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.4% 19.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst