Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Socialist Party Of Venezuela results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 519 hits. Analysis detected 2,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,480 of 37,536 keywords). This United Socialist Party Of Venezuela is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
United Socialist Party Of Venezuela
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510096.1% percentile
11.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 46.1%46.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 22.8%22.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 27.1%27.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 20.9%20.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 25.3%25.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 46.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos