Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 5,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,084 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,815 of 37,536 keywords). This Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,084
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate