Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 430 hits . Analysis detected 5,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,084 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,815 of 37,536 keywords). This Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Keyword details
Total words: 5,084
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst