Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Understaffing results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 1,007 hits . Analysis detected 5,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,460 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,356 of 37,536 keywords). This Understaffing is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Understaffing
Keyword details
Total words: 5,460
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst