Keyword summary
46%1 analyzed article/video910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Undercover Operations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 3,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,061 of 36,204 keywords). This Undercover Operations is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Undercover Operations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
40%Undercover Operations (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos