Keyword summary
29%1 analyzed article/video845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UK Charges results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,535 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,834 of 37,536 keywords). This UK Charges is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
UK Charges
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%UK Charges (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,535
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos