Keyword summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uber Lyft Taxis Regulations Curb Flow Philadelphia results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,929 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (18,374 of 37,536 keywords). This Uber Lyft Taxis Regulations Curb Flow Philadelphia is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Uber Lyft Taxis Regulations Curb Flow Philadelphia
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,929
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos