Keyword summary
49% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Trade Policy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,905 hits . Analysis detected 9,508 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,898 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,285 of 37,536 keywords). This U S Trade Policy is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. U S Trade Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 10,898
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst