Keyword summary
93%2 analyzed articles/videos970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S State Department results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 915 hits. Analysis detected 7,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,458 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,990 of 37,536 keywords). This U S State Department is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
U S State Department
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%U S State Department (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,458
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 20.5%20.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos