Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Defense Policy results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 519 hits . Analysis detected 2,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,482 of 37,536 keywords). This U S Defense Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. U S Defense Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.1% percentile 11.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 46.1% 46.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 22.8% 22.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 27.1% 27.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.3% 25.3% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 46.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst