Keyword summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.s. Attorney For The Southern District Of Texas results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (27,056 of 34,755 keywords). This U.s. Attorney For The Southern District Of Texas is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
U.s. Attorney For The Southern District Of Texas
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510022.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos