Keyword summary
59%2 analyzed articles/videos1,243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S And World results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 4,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,298 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,112 of 37,536 keywords). This U S And World is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
U S And World
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
31%U S And World (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,298
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos