Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U K Cases results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 1,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,437 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,424 of 34,832 keywords). This U K Cases is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
U K Cases
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
7%U K Cases (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,437
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos