Keyword summary
9% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tulane results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 187 hits . Analysis detected 1,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,021 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (33,828 of 37,004 keywords). This Tulane is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group. Tulane
Keyword details
Total words: 3,021
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst