Keyword summary
94%2 analyzed articles/videos1,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trust Act results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 578 hits. Analysis detected 5,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,323 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,933 of 37,536 keywords). This Trust Act is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Trust Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Trust Act (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,323
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos