Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Statement results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 1,074 hits. Analysis detected 7,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,071 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,041 of 37,533 keywords). This Trump Statement is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Trump Statement
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%Trump Statement (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,071
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.6% percentile
6.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 35.0%35.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 35.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate