Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Russia Ukraine War Ceasefire Prisoner Swap results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 472 hits . Analysis detected 1,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,132 of 37,536 keywords). This Trump Russia Ukraine War Ceasefire Prisoner Swap is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Trump Russia Ukraine War Ceasefire Prisoner Swap
Keyword details
Total words: 2,872
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst