Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tribalism results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 803 hits. Analysis detected 6,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Tribalism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tribalism
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Tribalism (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

England’s blind hope⁠43%
UnHerd⁠69%By Simon Critchley⁠0%7/16/2026, 8:38:20 AM