Keyword summary
81% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trial Lawyers results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Ad Hominem , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 868 hits . Analysis detected 8,666 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,532 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,795 of 37,536 keywords). This Trial Lawyers is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Trial Lawyers
Keyword details
Total words: 8,532
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst