Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tree Collapse results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 1,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,014 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Tree Collapse is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tree Collapse
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Tree Collapse (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,014
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos