Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transfers results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 1,604 hits. Analysis detected 5,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,483 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,105 of 37,313 keywords). This Transfers is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Transfers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
79%Transfers (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,483
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 35.8%35.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 35.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 28.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos