Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Toxic Pollution results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 1,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,897 keywords). This Toxic Pollution is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Toxic Pollution
Keyword details
Total words: 1,956
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst