Keyword summary
42%1 analyzed article/video2,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tower District results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 536 hits. Analysis detected 3,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,311 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (34,976 of 37,536 keywords). This Tower District is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Tower District
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
7%Tower District (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,311
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos