Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tower Climbers results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 2,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,059 of 37,536 keywords). This Tower Climbers is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Tower Climbers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%Tower Climbers (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,372
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.7%18.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos