Keyword summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tomatoes results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 877 hits . Analysis detected 5,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,709 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,915 of 37,536 keywords). This Tomatoes is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Tomatoes
Keyword details
Total words: 6,709
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst