Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Layward results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 556 hits. Analysis detected 3,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,469 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (8,070 of 37,536 keywords). This Tom Layward is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Tom Layward
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠79%Tom Layward (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,469
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 22.5%22.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos