Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 638 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Hanks results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 481 hits . Analysis detected 2,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,258 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,251 of 37,536 keywords). This Tom Hanks is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Tom Hanks
Keyword details
Total words: 4,258
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst