Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Token Demand results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,417 hits. Analysis detected 7,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,471 of 37,536 keywords). This Token Demand is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Token Demand
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Token Demand (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos