Keyword summary
78% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Howard results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,215 hits . Analysis detected 10,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,087 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,126 of 37,533 keywords). This Todd Howard is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Todd Howard
Keyword details
Total words: 12,087
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst