Keyword summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd And Julie Chrisley results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 274 hits. Analysis detected 1,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,423 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (35,594 of 55,388 keywords). This Todd And Julie Chrisley is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Todd And Julie Chrisley
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠36%Todd And Julie Chrisley (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,423
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos